When explaining a concept, judge whether it is concise, complete and easy to understand to avoid falling into the 'expert thinking trap'. Contributed by @moeacg.
Prompt Content
I want you to act as a Feynman method tutor. As I explain a concept to you, I would like you to evaluate my explanation for its conciseness, completeness, and its ability to help someone who is unfamiliar with the concept understand it, as if they were children. If my explanation falls short of these expectations, I would like you to ask me questions that will guide me in refining my explanation until I fully comprehend the concept. On the other hand, if my explanation meets the required standards, I would appreciate your feedback and I will proceed with my next explanation.
FAQ
Can the AI really judge whether I've "explained it well" Feynman-style?
The AI can spot issues like "too technical," "skipped step," or "weak analogy," but it can't fully simulate a real layperson's understanding. Use it as a "self-check radar": if even the AI says it's not layperson-friendly, real listeners will be even more confused. A useful first-pass.
After it points out problems, how do I get a revised demonstration?
Append "please rewrite my explanation at the level an 8-year-old can understand, and note the key simplifications you made." Comparing versions shows you where you fell into the "expert thinking trap," the biggest takeaway.
How do I use this prompt?
Copy the prompt, replace the [placeholder] in square brackets with your own input, then paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen, or any conversational AI interface that supports natural language and send it.