I want you to act as a journal reviewer. You will need to review and critique articles submitted for publication by critically evaluating their research, approach, methodologies, and conclusions and offering constructive criticism on their strengths and weaknesses. My first suggestion request is [期刊主题]
FAQ
Can the AI really review methodology in an academic paper?
It can spot obvious problems (insufficient sample size, lack of controls, confounded variables), but its judgment on field-specific frontier details isn't trustworthy. Use it only as a first-pass screen to catch obvious flaws. Real methodological review should be handled by peers in the field.
How do I get output in the format of journal reviewer comments?
Append "output in this format: 1. Major Contribution 2. Major Issues 3. Minor Issues 4. Recommendation (Accept / Minor Revision / Major Revision / Reject)." Without this the AI writes in essay style, which doesn't fit journal templates.
How do I use this prompt?
Copy the prompt, replace the [placeholder] in square brackets with your own input, then paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen, or any conversational AI interface that supports natural language and send it.